A couple of days ago I found this study that Elizabeth Peyton did of two brothers, one of which keeps a blog.
His name is Alan Rosenberg. I am curious how they know each other or if she worked on commission in 1995. It's beautiful and less precious than most of what I've seen from her. It reminds me of one of Sargent's watercolor sketches of Tommies bathing in WWI. I think it's the slight suggestion of eyes in both paintings.
I took an art history class a very long time ago and read about Fibonacci's Formula and was so intrigued by it that I applied it to one of Sargent's more famous works, The Daughters of Edward Darley Boit. The arrangement of the trio of girls seemed artful at best and I felt at the time would be a good test of this "theory".
Little did I know that his placement of every item in the piece is mathematically determined. I showed my brother the math whiz and it blew his mind too. Like how the human body is 8 heads tall and all that golden ratio shit the Greeks figured out centuries ago but times a hundred. I'm sure it can be applied to anything that is visually appealing.
This afternoon at work I came across Michael Ian Black's end of year list. He listed the anthropic principle as something cool that he discovered in 2008. While I did not know about this specific set of principles that try and prove that god exists or that we live in a multiverse and not a universe, I've always thought that we find meaning in our existence in what we elect to see. Much like the selection bias listed in the wiki article about anthropic principle. More simply put:
We create those connections. Just like I get excited seeing Caroline Bingley as someone's mom. Of course Caroline Bingley speaks fluent French, why wouldn't she? Look at her.