Ugggh, I loved everything tip to toe. The severe school matron hair all the way down to the platform python wedges. The whole collection felt tight, like Stefano was finally getting his Kaiser on, if you know what I'm saying. Respect the brand! I loved how nearly everything had a belt but didn't look Mobama'd. There was no "cinch it with a belt" feel. I hate the zhuzhing of poorly fitted items with belts to create a waistline. I almost wish for a single term presidency so she'll cease being a style icon. I do not know anyone that cares what she wears and do not understand why 3 years later people are still monitoring her on a daily basis. No one would think of photographing any other "tasteful" rich lady lawyer from Chicago because they are totally boring!
I loved the floral dress they put Lindsey Wixson in, that girl sure is a winner and gets the best outfits. Her face is all the personality she needs. I know Freja opens and closes a lot of shows but her and Snejana's forearm tattoos are NOT invited back to my theoretical runway. Visible tattoos are enough to put me off a designer's look and she is conspicuously not in any of my Spring picks. I don't need your weak personality interfering with a very specific story a designer is trying to sell. This isn't editorial work, cover that shit up. I think too many girls saw Gia as a modeling primer. That story ended in AIDS and bad poetry, so knock that shit off. Again I have to reiterate, tattoos? Really? Still? I'm that emphatic about it.
I'm pretty tired of doing these. Fashion month gets boring much quicker as I get older and I begin to feel like I'm scrolling through lookbook.nu and everyone no matter how interesting, seems to exist on a sliding scale of desperation for acceptance. I'd like to use my editorial eye if I thought it mattered and saved anyone the bother of looking through that boring Hermès show but it probably won't. You weren't going to look at it anyway because you're the worst.
Comments